Enterprise AI Orchestration

Autonomous agent orchestration with cryptographic accountability

Three questions Langfuse doesn’t pose: how much does each outcome cost (not each token); who approved; is it provable.

pipeline: sprint-intelligence · proof: 0x1a3f…9d2c ✓ STARK · agents: BUILDER TESTER SCRIBE
HMAC-SHA256
STARK Proofs
Brain-archived
Zero vendor lock-in
EU AI Act Art. 55(c)

How it works

From dispatch to proof in one loop

Orchestrate

5 agents · 10 pipelines · parallel dispatch · circuit breaker auto-failover per provider.

Attest

STARK proof per pipeline step · Ed25519 signed transcript · Brain-archived for audit trail.

Observe

Dashboard + preste CLI + mobile PWA + Telegram/Discord notifications.

Three questions your observability stack does not answer

Generic agent platforms track tokens and latency. They do not ask: how much does each outcome cost, who approved it, and is it provable? Command Center is built around those three questions.

Generic agent observability

Token-level visibility

  • Per-token telemetry
  • No outcome-level accountability
  • Approval trail bolted on after the fact
  • No cryptographic proof

Command Center

Outcome-level accountability

  • Per-result attestation : ~50ms STARK verify; 100KB compressed proof
  • Outcome cost tracking ; per-attestation pricing (ADR-ECO-059)
  • HITL approval gate built-in at every decision boundary
  • Brain entries cosine-deduped, EU AI Act Art. 55(c) ready

Transparent pricing

One attestation = 1 RunCertificate Ed25519 signed and anchored. Start free, scale as you grow.

Sandbox
€0 forever

100 attestations / month

Devs, design partners, POC evaluation

Start free
PAYG
€0.05 / attestation

Min €5/mo. None included.

Individual devs, small teams, irregular usage

Sign up
Best value
Pro
€500 / month

20 000 att/mo · €0.03 overage

Fintechs, growing teams, mid-market, audit firms

Choose Pro
Enterprise
Custom

Dedicated infra + SLA + Art. 55(c)

Banks, asset managers, public sector, regulated entities

Talk to us

Billing handled by vauban-billing per ADR-ECO-060 ; attestation = 1 RunCertificate Ed25519 signed and anchored.

Developer? Use the sovereign CLI directly →

npm install -g @vauban-org/preste

Frequently asked questions

Architecture, compliance, and pricing ; answered directly.

How is Command Center different from Langfuse?

Langfuse measures per-token telemetry. Command Center asks three questions Langfuse does not pose: how much did this outcome cost, who approved it, and can you prove it ran correctly? CC provides outcome-level attestation and an accountability layer that sits above Langfuse. The two coexist; CC does not replace observability tooling.

What does "STARK-attested" actually mean?

Every pipeline step receives a STARK proof produced via SHARP or Stwo, Ed25519-signed, and archived in Brain. The proof is verifiable in roughly 50 ms and compresses to roughly 100 KB. Any auditor can replay the verification independently without access to the original payload.

Is the SDK open-source?

Yes. The three published packages carry an MIT licence: @vauban-org/agent-sdk (npm), vauban-verify (PyPI), and cc-schemas (GitHub). The backend and dashboard remain closed-source. Mirrors are auto-published from the canonical source per ADR-ECO-014.

What data leaves my infrastructure?

On the Sovereign tier (on-premises deployment), nothing leaves. On all other tiers, only attestation hashes are transmitted; no payload content is sent to Vauban infrastructure. Brain remains self-hostable so your institutional memory stays under your control at every tier.

Why per-attestation pricing instead of per-token?

Token cost measures compute consumption. Attestation cost measures outcome delivery. Per ADR-ECO-059, aligning billing with verifiable outcomes produces predictable budgets and audit-ready invoices. A run that consumed 10k tokens to produce one verified outcome costs one attestation unit, regardless of token count. This is the freemium rationale: start free, pay for provable value.

What is Command Center's posture on EU AI Act Art. 55(c)?

GPAI provider obligations under EU AI Act Art. 55(c) became applicable on 2025-08-02. The RSO (founder in Phase 0 per ADR-ECO-047) decides on incident reporting when a serious incident occurs. Command Center infrastructure is designed to assist deployer GPAI compliance: attestation trails, human-in-the-loop gates, and audit reports map directly to Art. 55(c) evidence requirements. The 15-day notification SLA is tracked at the RSO level.